Quantcast
Channel: Space
Viewing all 4653 articles
Browse latest View live

This is one of the most detailed Milky Way galaxy maps yet

$
0
0

On Wednesday astronomers from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) released the most complete and detailed views of the Milky Way galaxy to date — at least as seen from the Southern Hemisphere.

The countless stitched-together photos provide a stunning new look at our galactic home.

galaxy apex milky way telescope spaceThe photos were captured Atacama Pathfinder Experiment telescope (APEX) in Chile, which can detect wavelengths beyond the spectrum of visible light.

These sub-millimeter wavelengths reveal clouds of gas that would otherwise be obscured by dust or water vapor.

milky way galaxy apex eso

Several "star nurseries" or nebulas — where stars are formed — show up crisp and clear in the new images.

nebula star apexMapping the southern skies is very important: That's where the Milky Way's center is located, and it's simultaneously buzzing with activity and objects (including a supermassive black hole) yet dense and hard to peer into.

The new images cut through some of this celestial fog, and should help astronomers learn more about the heart of the galaxy we call home.

sky segments atlasgal apex milky way galaxy

Be sure to check out the full, zoomable version of the map on ESO's website.

SEE ALSO: We're on a collision course with the Andromeda Galaxy — here's what will happen to Earth

CHECK OUT: This is what the entire universe looks like in one image

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists just discovered 883 galaxies that have been hiding in plain sight


Astronomers just located a mysterious cosmic phenomenon for the first time — but they have no idea what caused it

$
0
0

supernova exploding star illustration nasa

For years, astronomers have observed a peculiar phenomenon they call fast radio bursts (FRB) but could never pinpoint exactly where they came from or what made them.

Now, in a ground-breaking first, a team of scientists has reported the first calculated distance for one of the bursts. It's located well beyond our home galaxy, about 6 billion light years away.

FRBs only last for an instant and can release more energy in one millisecond than our Sun emits over 10,000 years.

But there's something bizarre about these bursts, which has led to some pretty eccentric ideas of their origin — including rumors that they might be generated by aliens — since the first FRB was discovered in 2007.

Defying the odds

Unlike pulsing stars or intermittent black hole jets, which emit anywhere from a few to thousands of electromagnetic signals over time, FRBs only seem to occur once for a given source. In other words, as far as astronomers can tell right now, FRBs don't repeat themselves.

death star a new hope"Why it would last only a millisecond and not repeat is a big mystery," Jill Tarter, who co-founded SETI and is the former director of the Center for SETI Research but was not part of the new research, told Business Insider last month.

Tarter has one idea, which she admits is a bit mischievous, but still not outside the realm of possibility. She said FRBs could be a sign of an intelligent alien species taking over the universe one planet at a time.

"[If] they know which planets are life bearing in the galaxy ... they could perhaps decide to eliminate these inhabited planets one after another, sequentially," Tarter said. "Which would provide a signal that showed up once or maybe twice and then didn't show up again for some totally unknown period."

This idea is just one of many. Other possible sources include the birth of new stars, the explosive result of two colliding black holes, or even two colliding neutron stars — the densest stars in the universe.

Whatever the source, this latest report on the first location of an FRB is an important step forward in solving the mystery.

"Our discovery opens the way to working out what makes these bursts," Simon Johnston, who's a member of the research team and Head of Astrophysics at CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) in Australia, said in a press release.

A ground-breaking first

The team used telescopes at CSIRO and Japan's Subaru telescope in Hawaii to make their discovery. The FRB was first observed in April 2015 by the CSIRO Parkes telescope, but because the burst was so brief, it had been impossible to identify its location.

106743_webIt was only after CSIRO followed up with its Compact Array telescope, an array of six 22-meter antennas, that the team got an idea of how far away this thing was. For six days after the burst, the Compact Array observed the FRB's faint afterglow, which allowed the team to nail down its location.

The light from the burst, they found, traveled six billion light years to get here. It most likely came from within a large, old galaxy, which they believe is producing stars at a much lower rate than the Milky Way, which produces about one per year.

"This is not what we expected," Johnston said in the press release. "It might mean that the FRB resulted from, say, two neutron stars colliding rather than anything to do with recent star birth."

CHECK OUT: There's an unsettling reason why we know about the gigantic fireball that no one ever saw

SEE ALSO: NASA's Curiosity Mars rover is snapping pictures of something unlike anything it has encountered before

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists are bashing authorities’ claims that a meteorite killed a bus driver in India

WATCH LIVE: SpaceX might crash a rocket into a barge tonight

$
0
0

spacex falcon 9

According to SpaceX's Twitter feed, a potentially historic rocket launch set for Thursday night looks like it'll be a go.

The company, led by tech entrepreneur Elon Musk, is planning to launch a satellite into orbit. But the coolest part happens afterward.

Part of the rocket will try to land itself on a woefully tricky target: a robotic barge floating off the coast of Florida.

The attempt will try to one-up its historic Dec. 21st launch and landing of a Falcon 9 rocket on solid ground.

SpaceX hopes to launch its Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on February 25 at 6:46 p.m. ET. It's pre-loaded with a commercial communications satellite, called SES-9, which the rocket will boost into geostationary orbit.

If SpaceX pulls off the feat of landing the rocket — which they don't think will go well ("a successful landing is not expected") — it could set the stage for an exciting new era of spaceflight. If it doesn't work out, we might see a pretty wild explosion.

Proving it can launch and precisely re-land a rocket at sea, then reuse it, could make access to space radically less expensive.

As of now, there's an 80% chance that the Falcon 9 rocket will launch tonight:

The launch was previously set for Wednesday, February 24, but it was scrubbed due to lousy weather.

If the conditions aren't right for the 90-minute launch window set for this evening, it's unclear when the next attempt will be. (Tech Insider has asked SpaceX and will update this post if we hear back.)

Watch live tonight

Bookmark this page to watch the potentially groundbreaking event live, below.

If the launch window holds for 6:46 p.m. ET, the streaming video footage should begin around 6:25 p.m. ET and last through roughly 9 p.m. ET.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Epic footage of SpaceX’s gutsy rocket landings

SpaceX postpones rocket launch with less than 2 minutes to lift off

$
0
0

24585667074_fa5239e138_k

Everything looked good for a SpaceX rocket launch on Thursday evening, but with just 1 minute and 40 seconds to go, the company stopped the countdown and announced the launch was going to have to wait for another day.

This would have been SpaceX's second launch mission for the year, which is set to transport the SES-9 communications satellite into orbit over Asia.

SpaceX engineers said during a live webcast that the rocket was in good health. And right now, the SpaceX team is reviewing the data to determine the next available launch date.

Thursday's launch attempt was actually a back-up for the original launch date, which was scheduled for Wednesday. Wednesday's launch was postponed due to inclement weather.

It is unclear when SpaceX will announce its next launch attempt, but once the date is set we'll start to get excited for another rocket landing attempt, which was scheduled to take place shortly after Thursday's launch. The landing attempt was planned to happen on a floating ocean platform called "Of Course I Still Love You."

Rocket landings are something that humans had never witnessed until 2015 – when the private spaceflight companies Blue Origin and SpaceX became the first in history to launch rockets to space and return them safely.

This is an incredible feat of engineering and will prove to be the defining factor between 20th century and 21st century spaceflight.

Right now, we're still in the infancy of reusable rocket technology, but if this proves to be a viable method for spaceflight, it would drastically cut spaceflight costs and potentially open a new world of possibilities for crewed space exploration.

DON'T MISS: The US government is evaluating sanctions against Russia that could destroy SpaceX's biggest competitor

LEARN MORE: Elon Musk's rocket landing could make space travel costs cheaper than a penthouse in NYC

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch never-before-seen footage of SpaceX's monumental rocket landing

Scientists say they can get spacecraft to Mars in 3 days using lasers — but there’s one big problem

Pluto just got even weirder with this unprecedented photo of its north pole

$
0
0

Wow.

That's what we have to say about this incredible new photo of Pluto's north pole that NASA just released:

pluto north pole nasa

The New Horizons spacecraft took this high-resolution shot as it approached the icy world on July 14, 2015.

We're only seeing it now because the robot has a small antenna and is speeding away from our solar system at about 32,000 mph. In fact, it could take until the end of 2016 to transmit all of the photos it took before, during, and after its fly-by.

But this photo isn't just pretty. It's revealing more weird truths about little ol' Pluto, which is technically classified as a dwarf planet — not a full-on planet, like Earth or diminutive Mercury. (Alan Stern, New Horizons' lead scientist, calls this demotion "bulls--t.")

"Pluto's north pole is criss-crossed by crazy rugged canyons and is covered in heavy methane snows," Stern told Tech Insider in an email. "The color of the snow varies from a yellowy hue near the pole to lighter grey-blue away from it." 

The yellow tint on the surface (note: not NASA's highlighting) might indicate older methane snow that's been pummeled over the millennia by solar and cosmic radiation. The blue-gray color might be younger methane snow that's seen less exposure.

To see what Stern is referring to, let's zoom in to the top-left part of the north pole:

pluto north pole nasa 1

You can really start to make out those crazy canyons, craters, plateaus, and shades of radiation-blasted methane snow.

In fact, NASA says these kinds of features are so unusual they are "not seen elsewhere on Pluto."

The space agency provided this highlighted version to mark a few things they see as rather odd:

pluto north pole nasa labeled 1

The green squiggly lines to the east and the west of Pluto's north pole are narrow canyons. That yellow patch is a very large canyon, at 45 miles wide, with a "winding valley" running through the middle (shown in blue).

NASA notes the walls of these gullies are very crumbled and degraded, which suggests they're incredibly ancient — unlike many larger patches of Pluto, which are "younger" and thought to be about 10 million years old. (NASA hasn't yet estimated how old the features are that it highlighted.)

Contrast that to the Grand Canyon, a geologic feature on a very dynamic planet (aka Earth) that is somewhere between 6 million and 70 million years old.

So what does it all mean?

Primarily, that Pluto is getting weirder with each new photo scientists glimpse.

For one, it has a strange mix of very ancient and also very young features. Second, it's not some static frozen ice ball; it was and possibly still is a very active, dynamic place. The canyons, for example, may have been formed by tectonic plate-like movement millions of years ago.

There's also this, Stern wrote: "Buried in those polar images are bound to be clues to Pluto's past climates!" Basically, Pluto may have also had a very busy atmosphere — even though its very thin and wispy right now.

That's pretty dynamic for a tiny planet that's minus-387 degrees Celsius and has no running water or other liquid.

We can't wait to see what else New Horizons' photos of Pluto reveal as they're beamed back to Earth.

And we're also looking forward to the spacecraft's next never-before-visited target: a tiny frozen rock in the Kuiper Belt called 2014 MU69. It's so ancient, it might represent some of the solar system's earliest building materials from 4.6 billion years ago.

NewHorizonsKBOencounter

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Pluto and its moon Charon have something that doesn't exist anywhere else in the solar system

These 13 photos perfectly capture astronaut Scott Kelly's year in space

$
0
0

Astronaut Scott Kelly has broken the record for spending more continuous time in space than any other NASA astronaut — 340 days in orbit. And on Tuesday, March 1, he's scheduled to return to planet Earth.

When he comes home, Kelly will have circled the globe 5,440 times, for a total distance of 143,846,525 miles, according to the New York Times.

That's a lot of time to take amazing photos.

And thanks to the magic of the Internet, he's been documenting the whole thing on Instagram for his 844,000 followers.

The photos are so incredible it would be impossible to rank them. These are the ones that perfectly capture his artistic eye.

This is just one of the 10,944 sunrises and sunsets Kelly had the chance to see in space.

Instagram Embed:
http://instagram.com/p/7p_pnzAXg9/embed/
Width: 800px

 



The NASA astronaut took countless shots of vibrant landscapes, like this one over Africa.

Instagram Embed:
http://instagram.com/p/BCG38mJgXpL/embed/
Width: 800px

 



The flowers in this Valentine's bouquet are from one of the 400 experiments Kelly worked on.

http://instagram.com/p/BBxzTSHgXnh/embed/
Width: 800px

 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Scientists have estimated that the universe won’t end for at least 2.8 billion years

$
0
0

entire observable universe logarithmic illustration

One day, the Universe is going to die out — that's something scientists can agree on.

But exactly how and when that will happen is a more of a gray area, and it's not something we've really had to worry about, with current predictions putting any such event tens of billions of years in the future — long after our Sun burns out.

But what if our current predictions are wrong?

A team of researchers has investigated an alternate hypothesis and, given the worst case scenario, they found that the soonest the Universe could come to an untimely end would be 2.8 billion years from now.

"We’re safe," lead researcher Diego Sáez-Gómez from the University of Lisbon in Portugal told Jacob Aron from New Scientist.

The scenario that Sáez-Gómez was investigating is known as the 'big rip', and it's quickly becoming a leading hypothesis for how the Universe could end.

For those who haven't read too much about the sad death of our Universe, there are a few ways it could happen, but the leading scenario goes something like this: the Universe continues to expand at an increasing rate until eventually the stars die out, everything drifts apart, and the Universe gets so cold that it suffers what's known as a 'heat death'. There's also the idea of the 'big crunch', where the expansion the Universe eventually collapses in on itself.

But since the discovery of dark energy, physicists have been toying with another alternative. "Until now we thought the Universe would either re-collapse to a big crunch or expand forever to a state of infinite dilution," end-of-the-Universe expert Robert Caldwell from Dartmouth College, told New Scientist back in 2003. "Now we’ve come up with a third possibility — the big rip."

The big rip is based on the idea that the Universe's expansion is getting faster all the time, and that acceleration is being driven by dark energy. So if the total amount of dark energy in the Universe is increasing, as some researchers have proposed, then that expansion could continue to speed up until the very fabric of the Universe is torn apart.

It'd be an unfortunate way to go, and previous predictions had put that event at around 22 billion years in the future — way too far away for us to be concerned about. But we're continually learning more about dark energy, and how it controls the expansion of the Universe, so Sáez-Gómez decided to model some other scenarios based on the latest data.

These models allowed his team to come up with a timeline for both the earliest and latest the big rip could occur. "We show that quite generally, the lower bound for the singularity time can not be smaller than about 1.2 times the age of the Universe, what roughly speaking means approximately 2.8 [billion years] from the present time," they write at pre-print website, arXiv.org.

That's good news, but even better is the fact that "the upper bound goes to infinity", Sáez-Gómez explains. That would mean that the big rip never happens, and the heat death of the Universe occurs instead.

To be clear, it's pretty unlikely the Universe will actually be done in 2.8 billion years, especially seeing as our Sun is expected to be around for at least another 5 billion years. Caldwell called the lower bound "very conservative". But the process of coming up with these potential timelines is incredibly useful for scientists.

"Scenarios like the big rip result from a lack of understanding of physics in particular our inability to marry quantum mechanics and general relativity, the theory of gravity," writes Aron. "Exploring the possibilities could show us a way forward."

SEE ALSO: Most of the universe is missing — here are 5 ambitious experiments that might find the rest

CHECK OUT: This is what the entire universe looks like in one image

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 40 years ago, NASA sent a message to aliens — here's what it says


Stunning new photos of the Milky Way give us the most detailed look of our galaxy yet

See how high you can jump on other worlds in the solar system

$
0
0

woman runner running jumping tough mudder race RTR4BK4H

Jumping contests on Earth are pretty great.

But have you imagined how high you could hop on the moon, Mars, or some other heavenly body?

Look no further: Astronomers Stuart Lowe and Chris North have crunched the numbers into an interactive browser app, called High Jump.

Their app highlights the wildly different gravitational fields across the solar system. It's simple, educational — and weirdly addictive.

Here are a few things we learned by clicking "Jump!"

This is Earth. You've jumped here before.



This is a normal vertical hop for a person on Earth. The top of your head might break 7 feet.

earth space high jump gif



On to the moon: the only place other than Earth where humans have dared to leaped.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 5 biggest meteors to crash into Earth

$
0
0

Asteroid Crash from space

We live on a moving target in a cosmic firing range.

Each day, the Earth is bombarded by about a hundred tonnes of space debris. It may sound alarming, but this is really nothing to worry about.

Most of the objects that fall towards our planet are pretty small – typically about the size of a grain of sand or even smaller – and burn up in the upper atmosphere tens of kilometers above the ground.

But every now and again, something much bigger plummets Earthward and blazes a trail across the sky.

Some make the headlines whereas others arrive almost unnoticed. Here are the most interesting movers and shakers.

SEE ALSO: New research points to something unsettling about the giant meteor that slammed into Russia 3 years ago

CHECK OUT: Russia wants to use Cold War-style missiles to save Earth from rogue asteroids

1. South Atlantic meteor

On February 6, a chunk of interplanetary rubble, probably made of rock and measuring roughly five meters across, entered the Earth’s upper atmosphere. Hurtling across the sky at tens of kilometers a second, the air ahead of the meteor was compressed and heated, vaporizing the object as it penetrated deep into the atmosphere. At some point, as the meteor streaked 20-30km above the South Atlantic ocean, it exploded with about the same force as 12,000 tonnes of TNT (about the same explosive force as the atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima).

Oddly enough, nobody saw this meteor explosion. We only know about it because of measurements made by various defence and scientific facilities that recorded the resulting atmospheric disturbances. The Earth is mainly ocean and uninhabited land and the odds are that most meteors burn up like this one, without any witnesses.



2. Chelyabinsk meteor

In contrast, some meteors grab worldwide attention. This fireball tore across the dawn skiesover Chelyabinsk, Russia, on February 15 2013. Moving at around 20km a second, the fireball was many times brighter than the sun and was captured by car dashboard, CCTV and mobile phone cameras across the region.

Estimates indicate that object was about 20 metres across and exploded with the force of 500,000 tonnes of TNT, shattering thousands of windows, leaving a trail of damage 55 miles on either side of the rock’s trajectory and causing injuries to over 1,200 residents in the region. Although this object exploded in the atmosphere, the Chelyabinsk meteor hinted at the damage that an airburst can inflict on a populated area.

 



3. 2008 TC3

This four-meter diameter object, weighing in around 80 tonnes, entered Earth’s atmosphere over northern Sudan on the morning of October 7 2008. Moving at about 13km a second, the meteor exploded tens of kilometers above the ground with a force of about 1,000 tonnes of TNT, lighting up the dawn sky as a fireball that was observed over 1,000 kilometers away.

Although not particularly well-known, 2008 TC3 was a notable first – it was the first object to be observed and tracked prior to reaching Earth. This means it provided a much-needed test of the process of detecting and tracking near-Earth objects. Other incoming meteors have been detected since, but the process is not infallible. For example, the much bigger Chelyabinsk meteor remained undetected until its arrival in the skies over Russia.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Here’s how we could build a colony on an alien world

$
0
0

mars one

If the human race is to survive in the long-run, we will probably have to colonise other planets.

Whether we make the Earth uninhabitable ourselves or it simply reaches the natural end of its ability to support life, one day we will have to look for a new home.

Hollywood films such as The Martian and Interstellar give us a glimpse of what may be in store for us.

Mars is certainly the most habitable destination in our solar system, but there are thousands of exoplanets orbiting other stars that could be a replacement for our Earth.

So what technology will we need to make this possible?

We effectively already have one space colony, the International Space Station (ISS).

But it is only 350km away from Earth and relies on a continuous resupply of resources for its crew of six.

Much of the technology developed for the ISS, such as radiation shielding, water and air recycling, solar power collection, is certainly transferable to future space settlements.

However, a permanent space colony on the surface of another planet or moon adds a new set of challenges.

Unnatural habitat

The first requirement for a human settlement is a habitat, an isolated environment able to maintain air pressure, composition (the amount of oxygen), and temperature, and protect the inhabitants from radiation. This is likely to be a relatively large and heavy structure.

Launching large, heavy objects into space is a costly and difficult job. Spacecraft since the Apollo missions, which comprised several modules that had to separate and dock, have been sent up in pieces and assembled by astronauts. But given the impressive steps forward we are seeing in autonomous control, the pieces of a colony habitat may be able to assemble themselves. Today, manoeuvres similar to the Apollo docking are performed completely automatically.

image 20160225 15170 19efl2c

The alternative would be to carry a minimal “toolbox” from Earth and manufacture the habitat using locally-harvested resources. Specifically, 3D printers could be used to turn minerals from the local soil into physical structures. We’ve actually already started looking at making this possible. Private firm Planetary Resources has demonstrated 3D printing using raw material from a metal-rich asteroid sample found on Earth in an impact site. And NASA has installed a 3D printer on the ISS to show it can be used in zero-gravity, potentially as a way of making spacecraft components in space.

Liquid lifeline

Once the habitat is built, the colony will need continuous supplies of water, oxygen, energy and food to sustain its inhabitants, presuming the colony wasn’t built on an idyllic Earth-like planet with these resources in abundance. Water is fundamental for life as we know it but could also be used to make propellant or radiation shielding.

An initial settlement would need to carry a certain amount of water and recycle all waste liquids. This is already done on the ISS, where no drop of liquid (washing, sweat, tears, or even urine) is wasted. But a colony would also likely try to extract water, possibly from underground supplies of liquid – as may exist on Mars– or ice, as can been found under the surface of certain asteroids.

Water also provides a source of oxygen. On the ISS, oxygen is generated by using a process known as electrolysis to separate it from the hydrogen in water. NASA is also working on developing techniques to regenerate oxygen from atmospheric byproducts, such as the carbon dioxide we exhale while breathing.

Energy farming

the martian

Producing energy is probably the technological aspect of starting a colony that we are best prepared for thanks to photo-voltaic solar panels. But depending on the location of the colony planet, we may need to improve this technology much further. At Earth distance, we can obtain about 470W of electric power for each square metre of solar cells. This value is lower on the surface of Mars because it is 50% further from the sun than Earth and has a thick atmosphere that partially shields the sunlight.

In fact, Mars’s atmosphere is subject to periodic sand storms, which are notoriously problematic as the sand further limits the amount of received light and can also collect on and cover the panels. But we have already started to deal with these issues in the design of our current rover missions to Mars. For example, NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers Spirit and Opportunity were designed to last about 90 days but after more than 12 years, they are still operational. And we’ve discovered that Martian wind periodically cleans the dust from the panels.

A colony needs to be self-sustained so – without a Star Trek-style replicator– farming will be essential for producing food. Crops can also be used to convert carbon dioxide in the air back into breathable oxygen. Growing plants on Earth is relatively easy because the environment is what they have been adapting to for thousands of years, but growing fruits and vegetables in space or in another planet is not as simple.

Temperature, pressure, humidity, carbon dioxide levels, composition of soil and gravity all affect the survival and growth of plants, with different effects on different species. Several studies and experiments are currently ongoing to try to grow plants in controlled chambers that mimic the environment of a space colony. One potential solution that has already been proven on Earth with radishes, lettuces and green onions is hydroponic farming, which involves growing plants in a nutrient-enriched fluid without any soil.

Climate change

The final requirement for a space colony will be keeping the climate habitable. Atmospheric composition and climate on other celestial bodies are very different to Earth’s. There is no atmosphere on the moon or asteroids, and on Mars the atmosphere is made mainly of carbon dioxide, producing surface temperatures of 20°C down to -153°C during winter at the poles, and an air pressure just 0.6% of Earth’s. In such prohibitive conditions, settlers will be limited to living inside the isolated habitats and strolls outside will only be possible using spacesuits.

One alternative solution may be to change the planet’s climate on a large scale. We’re already studying such “geo-engineering” as a way to respond to Earth’s climate change. This would require huge effort but similar techniques could be scaled and applied for example to other planets such as Mars.

Possible methods include bioengineering organisms to convert carbon dioxide in the atmosphere to oxygen, or darkening the Martian polar caps to reduce the amount of sunlight they reflect and increase the surface temperature. Alternatively, a large formation of orbiting solar mirrors could reflect the light of the sun on specific regions such as the poles to cause a local increase in temperature. Some have speculated that such relatively small temperature changes could trigger the climate to take on a new state with much higher air pressure, which could be the first step towards terraforming Mars.

Matteo Ceriotti, Lecturer in space systems engineering, University of Glasgow. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

SEE ALSO: 14 horrible things that could happen if we colonize Mars

CHECK OUT: Here's what it's like to live inside a tiny dome on 'Mars' for 8 months

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The most difficult space mission in history is coming

The fascinating and terrible things that would happen to you if you tried to fly on Jupiter — and other planets

$
0
0

venus

What if you tried to fly an airplane on Mercury, Venus, and every other planet in our solar system?

Well, you couldn't do it with just one person — or even with just one plane. Along the way, the harsh environments would destroy both you and your aircraft in a number of horrible ways.

But how exactly would it happen?

Randall Munroe, founder of the popular webcomic xkcd, explores the different ways you would crash and die in his entertaining book "What If? Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions."

Here they are:

LEARN MORE: We're on a collision course with the Andromeda Galaxy — here's what will happen to Earth

CHECK OUT: NASA just released footage of the most mysterious pyramid in the solar system

Planes use the air on Earth to generate a difference in pressure below and above the wings, which produces lift. But there's no atmosphere on Mercury, which means you couldn't even glide on it. If you drove the plane off of a cliff, you'd fall and crash like this:

via GIPHY



Venus's atmosphere is 60 times more dense than Earth's at the surface, which would be plenty to generate lift. But you'd be flying through air that's over 400 degrees Fahrenheit — hot enough to melt lead and, incidentally, set your plane on fire:

via GIPHY



Earth is a perfect place to fly an airplane, and it comes with an amazing view. Try it some time:

via GIPHY



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

NASA's New Horizons spacecraft is finding phenomenal things on Pluto

$
0
0

Pluto

Back when I was a kid, I had no idea we'd ever be doing geology at the ends of the solar system.

If I'd known then I could combine my love of astronomy with my passion for geology, I might even have abandoned my dreams of fiction writing and poured myself into a degree in the planetary sciences.

Now we have robots in space, doing actual geology on other worlds.

We've seen what the rovers on Mars have been up to.

Now we'll turn to distant Pluto, which recently got downgraded to dwarf planet status. But just because a world is small doesn't mean it can't have world-class geology, and the things we're finding on Pluto are truly phenomenal.

It's the pits.

Pluto New Horizons

Mission scientists believe these mysterious indentations may form through a combination of ice fracturing and evaporation. The scarcity of overlying impact craters in this area also leads scientists to conclude that these pits – typically hundreds of yards across and tens of yards deep – formed relatively recently. Their alignment provides clues about the ice flow and the exchange of nitrogen and other volatile materials between the surface and the atmosphere.

I'm intrigued! I want to know what geologic processes are acting on Pluto that resurface the planet and erase the impact craters in some regions. I want to know more about these pits, and the different kinds of ice that are basically rocks on this frigid, distant dwarf planet.I cannot wait for the papers to start coming out!

It's got mountains and plains and glaciers - so much like Earth, only so very different.

color swath pluto

This is a breathtaking look at just a tiny fragment of the geology we'll get to explore on this tiny world. It's full of mountains and plains and glaciers and intriguing cracks, oh my!

Floating hills.

Pluto New Horizons

The nitrogen ice glaciers on Pluto appear to carry an intriguing cargo: numerous, isolated hills that may be fragments of water ice from Pluto’s surrounding uplands. These hills individually measure one to several miles or kilometers across, according to images and data from NASA’s New Horizons mission.

The hills, which are in the vast ice plain informally named Sputnik Planum within Pluto’s ‘heart,’ are likely miniature versions of the larger, jumbled mountains on Sputnik Planum’s western border. They are yet another example of Pluto’s fascinating and abundant geological activity.

Water ice, being less dense than nitrogen ice, can float atop the nitrogen glaciers all the way down to the plain. Floating hills! How cool is that?

But so far, nothing is quite as cool as the ice volcanoes. Volcanoes! On Pluto!

Pluto New Horizons

We don't know for sure the two suspected volcanoes we've found actually are volcanoes, but they surely do look like they are:

Of course, broad mountains with central craters are found elsewhere in the Solar System, like Mauna Loa on planet Earth and Olympus Mons on Mars. In fact, New Horizons scientists announced the striking similarity of Pluto's Wright Mons, and nearby Piccard Mons, to large shield volcanoes strongly suggests the two could be giant cryovolcanoes that once erupted molten ice from the interior of the cold, distant world.

Molten ice! Sounds like an oxymoron, but at Pluto temperatures, water basically would be magma. I wonder if what erupted was a slush? It's going to be so awesome to find out. And just imagine if Pluto's cryovolcanoes are still active, and a future mission catches one erupting.

And, finally, our very first geologic map of Pluto:

Geologic map Pluto New Horizons

We don't have enough information to do more but vaguely describe what we're seeing, but it's a start. Human geologists may never be able to get their rock hammers on Pluto's icy features, but I hope that in our lifetimes, a robot geologist is able to explore, sample, and analyze those intriguing features.

What we've seen so far is like that delightful combination of scents wafting from the kitchen as dinner cooks. We know it's going to be great, and it can't come soon enough. Pluto turns out to be one of the most intriguing wee worlds in our solar system. I can't wait to see what it serves up!

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Pluto and its moon Charon have something that doesn't exist anywhere else in the solar system

Here's why SpaceX canceled its launch twice — and when the next attempt will be

$
0
0

24631230904_e19a108a80_k

After postponing its second launch of the year twice in the last week, SpaceX announced that it is ready to try again on Sunday, Feb. 28 at 6:46 p.m. ET.

CLICK HERE TO WATCH LIVE.

Scrubbing a launch is not uncommon in the rocket business, nor is it necessarily a sign that something is wrong with the rocket, or its cargo.

There are a number of factors to consider when launching a rocket including weather, fuel temperatures, and boats that stray too close to the launch pad.

And as of Thursday evening, the rocket was reportedly in good health. So why the cancellations?

SpaceX was originally scheduled to launch the 11,750-pound SES-9 telecommunications satellite on Wednesday, Feb. 24 out of its launch site at Cape Canaveral in Florida.

However, because of inclement weather, the SpaceX launch team postponed the launch a few hours before the scheduled lift off. SpaceX later added that the launch was also postponed, in part, out of concerns with the rocket's fuel.

"Out of an abundance of caution, the team opted to hold launch for today to ensure liquid oxygen temperatures are as cold as possible in an effort to maximize performance of the vehicle," SpaceX stated on its webcast website.

SpaceX began using a new kind of fuel with its upgraded Falcon 9 rockets last December, which now run on deep cryo liquid oxygen (LOX). This fuel has the benefit of being more dense than other rocket propellants, so you can pack more of it into rocket fuel tanks — which adds to its power— but the trade-off is that you have to chill it at -340 degrees Fahrenheit.

After SpaceX postponed the launch on Wednesday, the next available launch window was for Thursday evening. Everything looked good on Thursday until, seemingly out of nowhere, the launch team held the countdown with just 1 minute and 40 seconds to go.

SpaceX has not announced details for why they called off the launch. What we know is that the launch team decided to hold as the LOX was being pumped into the rocket.

“Preliminary (information) is that we were … looking at how much time we had left in the count to finish loading the liquid oxygen, and at that time, the launch team decided that we would need to hold the countdown,” SpaceX commentator John Insprucker said during a live webcast, as reported by Fortune.

At this point, anyone who's followed SpaceX launches knows that these delays are relatively common. And, in the end, it's far wiser — and cheaper — to be safe than sorry.

Sunday's rocket launch is scheduled to happen at 6:46 p.m. ET followed shortly by another exciting, and potentially historic, rocket landing attempt.

The landing attempt will take place about 10 minutes after lift off, when the first stage will turn around and use GPS tracking to guide itself onto SpaceX's floating ocean platform called "Of Course I Still Love You." The platform will be floating about 400 miles off Florida's coast.

If SpaceX succeeds, it will be the first successful rocket landing on board an ocean platform. This will be its fourth attempt, and while the company has stated that it has low expectations of success, these rocket landings are a novelty of 21st century spaceflight and worth getting excited about.

DON'T MISS: The US government is evaluating sanctions against Russia that could destroy SpaceX's biggest competitor

LEARN MORE: Elon Musk's rocket landing could make space travel costs cheaper than a penthouse in NYC

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Epic footage of SpaceX’s gutsy rocket landings


The 12 most compelling scientific findings that suggest aliens are real

$
0
0

hubble crab nebula

Every one of us is made up of atoms that were once part of an exploding star, including atomic carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen — some of the fundamental ingredients for life.

Over billions of years, these ingredients condense to form gas clouds, new stars, and planets, which means that the ingredients, and therefore the potential, for life beyond Earth are scattered across the universe.

What's more, a number of recent discoveries also strongly suggest that alien life exists, either in our own solar system or beyond.

The ultimate question is no longer "Is there life beyond Earth?" but rather "Will we ever find it?"

Here's what we know:

DON'T MISS: There's a rare supermoon total lunar eclipse happening this weekend, and it won't come again until 2033

UP NEXT: 9 tripped-out sci-fi technologies in 'The Martian' that NASA really uses

Earlier this year, a team of scientists estimated that about 4.5 billion years ago at least one-fifth of Mars was covered in an ocean more than 450 feet deep. Any signs of life that swam in these waters could therefore be hidden in the Martian soil.

Read more about the study here.



But water isn't enough. You also need time. As it happens, a study last August discovered that water had existed on Mars for 200 million years longer than previously thought. What's more, there was life on Earth the same time as some of the last lakes on Mars.

Read more about the study here.



Asteroids and comets are key to the formation of life on Earth, scientists think. In particular, comet impacts, according to a report last August, likely caused amino acids to combine and form the building blocks of life. From what we know about solar-system formation, there are other comets in other planetary systems that could be doing the same thing right now.

Read more about the report from last August here.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

We're on a collision course with the Andromeda Galaxy — here's what will happen to Earth

$
0
0

Milky Way Galaxy

An epic war is coming between our home galaxy and the Andromeda Galaxy, which is currently racing toward us at a speed of 250,000 mph.

Astronomers estimate that 3.75 billion years from now, Earth will be caught up amid the largest galactic event in our planet's history, when these two giant galaxies collide.

Luckily, experts think that Earth will survive, but it won't be entirely unaffected. The collision will unfold right in front of us, changing the night sky to look like nothing any human has seen before.

Join us on a journey into the future to see what it will be like:

SEE ALSO: A world-leading scientist on the search for extraterrestrials pointed out a flaw in Stephen Hawking's fear of finding intelligent aliens

DON'T MISS: Epically awesome pictures of Saturn

Far from city lights, on a clear night, this is what the sky on Earth looks like today. During certain times of the year, you can see the Andromeda Galaxy, circled below, next to the bright band of our own Milky Way.



Right now, Andromeda is about 2.5 million light-years away. When it collides with our galaxy in less than 4 billion years, it will enter into a cataclysmic dance lasting billions of years that will rip it and the Milky Way apart to form a new galaxy.



Just before Andromeda collides, Earthlings will have a gorgeous view. On the left you can see Andromeda as it approaches the Milky Way through mutual gravitational attraction.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

WATCH LIVE: SpaceX might crash a rocket into a boat tonight

$
0
0

falcon 9 spacex

Note: Scroll down and click the play button to view the live webcast.

The saying "third time's the charm" rarely applies to rockets — one of humanity's most fickle creations — but it wouldn't surprise us to know that tech magnate Elon Musk is uttering the phrase right now.

SpaceX, which is led by Musk, hopes to launch one of its Falcon 9 rockets Sunday night at 6:46 p.m. ET from Cape Canaveral, Florida — and this will be the company's third attempt to do so since Wednesday, February 24.

The payload isn't all that unusual: It's a communications satellite called SES-9 that should bring better coverage over Asia.

The 229-foot-tall Falcon 9 rocket, however, is a very odd bird.

Most rockets cost tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, yet sink to the ocean bottom after they deliver a payload to space. But tonight, after boosting SES-9 into geostationary orbit, the Falcon 9 will try to autonomously land a huge piece of itself on a robotic ship at sea.

SpaceX attempted this on two separate occasions in the past year, but both rockets toppled onto the robo-ship and blew up into fireballs. (A third Falcon 9 was equipped to land, too, but never got the chance because it exploded shortly after launch.)

spacex falcon 9 rocket landing first stageIn fact, the company said in a press release for this launch that "a successful landing is not expected."

Translation: We think our rocket will most likely explode into bits when it tries to land itself.

Still, the stakes can't be ignored: Each of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets costs about $60 million. If SpaceX can land even part of that hardware, clean it up, and refuel it for a future launch, it'd be a history-making event.

It might also help usher in an era of spaceflight that's radically less expensive. Musk has said that a 100-fold cost reduction is possible, should his rocket-recycling scheme prove as repeatable and reliable as flying an airplane.

And there's reason to believe SpaceX just might succeed this time. On December 21, 2015, the company launched and landed a Falcon 9 rocket on solid ground.

It's not a robotic platform wobbling in the Atlantic Ocean, but it's still pretty impressive.

Watch the launch live tonight

Bookmark this page to watch the potentially groundbreaking event live (below) on Sunday, February 28, 2016.

If the launch window holds for 6:46 p.m. ET — and isn't scrubbed a third time — streaming video footage should begin around 6:30 p.m. ET and last through roughly 9 p.m. ET.

If the webcast locks up, try streaming this feed as an alternative. You can watch a highly technical feed here if you're the rocket scientist type.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is how Elon Musk wants to drastically reduce the cost of space flight

SpaceX is about to launch its second rocket of the year — here's how to watch live

$
0
0

After postponing its second launch of the year twice in the last week, SpaceX announced that it is ready to try again on Sunday, Feb. 28.

Lift off was scheduled for 6:46 p.m. ET, but after concerns about a boat that could be too close to the rocket launch or landing site, take-off was temporarily postponed.

As of right now, the launch has been rescheduled to take place at 7:21 p.m. ET — as long as the boat moves safely out of range. You can watch the action unfold in the live webcast below or on YouTube:

SpaceX's main mission for this launch is to transport the SES-9 communications satellite into orbit over Asia.

However, the more dramatic, secondary goal will be what happens about 10 minutes after lift-off.

That's when the rocket's first stage will turn around and use GPS tracking to guide itself onto SpaceX's floating ocean platform called "Of Course I Still Love You."

The platform will be floating about 400 miles off Florida's coast.

If SpaceX succeeds, it will be the first successful rocket landing on board an ocean platform in history.

This will be SpaceX fourth attempt at such a landing, and while the company has stated that it has low expectations of success, these rocket landings are a novelty of 21st century spaceflight and worth getting excited about. 

If reusable rockets prove a viable method of spaceflight, it could transform the industry and pave a new era of more affordable space launches.

Ultimately, SpaceX's founder and CEO Elon Musk hopes affordable rocket launches could eventually pave the way to colonies on Mars.

DON'T MISS: Here's why SpaceX canceled its launch twice

LEARN MORE: Elon Musk's rocket landing could make space travel costs cheaper than a penthouse in NYC

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Epic footage of SpaceX’s gutsy rocket landings

SpaceX is 'scrambling' to get a boat to move out of its way for tonight's rocket launch

$
0
0

Filipino soldiers wave from the dilapidated Sierra Madre ship of the Philippine Navy as it is anchored near Ayungin shoal (Second Thomas Shoal) in the Spratly group of islands in the South China Sea, west of Palawan, Philippines, in this May 11, 2015 file photo. REUTERS/Ritchie A. Tongo/Pool/Files

Note: Scroll down and click the play button to view the live webcast.

SpaceX, led by tech magnate Elon Musk, is trying to launch one of its Falcon 9 rockets from Cape Canaveral, Florida, tonight — the company's third attempt to do so since Wednesday, February 24.

However, right before the rocket was supposed to launch, a ship moved into the safety zone somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean.

Musk said via Twitter that the company is "scrambling" to get the vessel to move, since — should anything go wrong — SpaceX doesn't want to pose a threat to the people on board:

If the boat doesn't move by 7:19 p.m. ET, SpaceX may need to scrub the launch and try again another day.

Not your average rocket

The payload for Sunday night's launch isn't all that unusual: It's a communications satellite called SES-9 that should bring better coverage over Asia.

The 229-foot-tall Falcon 9 rocket, however, is a very odd bird.

Most rockets cost tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, yet sink to the ocean bottom after they deliver a payload to space. But tonight, after boosting SES-9 into geostationary orbit, the Falcon 9 will try to autonomously land a huge piece of itself on a robotic ship at sea.

SpaceX attempted this on two separate occasions in the past year, but both rockets toppled onto the robo-ship and blew up into fireballs. (A third Falcon 9 was equipped to land, too, but never got the chance because it exploded shortly after launch.)

spacex falcon 9 rocket landing first stageIn fact, the company said in a press release for this launch that "a successful landing is not expected."

Translation: We think our rocket will most likely explode into bits when it tries to land itself.

Still, the stakes can't be ignored: Each of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rockets costs about $60 million. If SpaceX can land even part of that hardware, clean it up, and refuel it for a future launch, it'd be a history-making event.

It might also help usher in an era of spaceflight that's radically less expensive. Musk has said that a 100-fold cost reduction is possible, should his rocket-recycling scheme prove as repeatable and reliable as flying an airplane.

And there's reason to believe SpaceX just might succeed this time. On December 21, 2015, the company launched and landed a Falcon 9 rocket on solid ground.

It's not a robotic platform wobbling in the Atlantic Ocean, but it's still pretty impressive.

Watch the launch live tonight

Bookmark this page to watch the potentially groundbreaking event live (below) on Sunday, February 28, 2016.

If the launch window holds for 6:46 p.m. ET — and isn't scrubbed a third time — streaming video footage should begin around 6:30 p.m. ET and last through roughly 9 p.m. ET.

If the webcast locks up, try streaming this feed as an alternative. You can watch a highly technical feed here if you're the rocket scientist type.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is how Elon Musk wants to drastically reduce the cost of space flight

Viewing all 4653 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>